Our clients’ management team would like us to compare a straight-forward
linear model with the multiplicative model that we came up with for our original
submission. They want to know if there is anything to be gained from their
basing their management decisions on the more complicated multiplicative model.
Or is a linear model almost as good? As we all know, simpler is better. But
if there is indeed something to be gained from using the more complicated
multiplicative model then we should point out exactly what it is. Otherwise, we
should recommend that they use the simpler linear model.
Actually, this request should enable us to sharpen our analysis considerably.
For example, we can now compare the R2 and S
e that we calculated for our
multiplicative model to the R2 and S
e generated by the linear model (we don’t
have to calculate these latter ourselves, however, since they are valid for linear
models). Also, we can compare the fitted vs. observed graphs and the residual vs.
fits graphs of the two models to see if we can detect a difference in goodness of fit
or accuracy.
Attachment: Data file C12 Insurance.xls [.rda] To: Analysis Staff
From: Top Modeler
Date: May 28, 2008
Re: Operating Costs for Insurance Company
Here’s how you might go about dealing with this assignment: